About the Digital Emblem Standards Organization
The Digital Emblem Standards Organization exists to encourage open standards and their implementation in the area of digital emblems.
Background
Digital emblems are the 21st-century evolution of the visual sigils which indicate that people, places, objects, digital data at rest or in transit, and online services enjoy special protections or require special identification under international law.
International law defines a number of emblems, such as the blue helmets of UN peacekeeping forces and the blue-and-white shield of UNESCO, as indicative of special protections. Journalists wear “Press” emblems to distinguish themselves from combatants on the battlefield. The emblems of national governments and intergovernmental organizations protect diplomatic pouches, couriers, and envoys. International shipments of protected artworks, endangered species of plants and animals, trademarked goods in danger of counterfeiting, and nuclear fuels and waste, all likewise require explicit markings under international law.
However, the visual emblems which have traditionally been used to signal these protections have many deficiencies:
- They are subject to misuse in ways that are difficult to detect, and such abuse reduces trust in the emblem.
- They may not be visible in the dark, at a distance, or at an oblique angle, or from the opposite side of an object.
- They may be subject to wear, obfuscation, or vandalism.
There are also less obvious ways in which visual emblems fail to serve modern needs:
- They are intended for human recognition, but are not amenable to machine-readability.
- They cannot mark electronic services, like web sites and email.
- They cannot be attached to digital data, in transit or at rest.
- There are no mechanisms to prevent them from being affixed to an unauthorized asset, or displayed in a different time or place than authorized or intended.
- There’s no way to associate an emblem with a specific quantity of persons or items, or a specific physical extent or geographic area.
- There is no way to deprecate or revoke instances of visual emblems which have been compromised, are being abused, or are no longer relevant or needed.
Digital emblems address each of these deficiencies, through a set of global open standards which may be implemented without licensing fees or restrictions.
Each digital emblem consists of a set of records which are associated with a person, place, or object; or with digital data at rest or in transit, or with networked digital services. They identify the protected item and communicate the nature of the protections it enjoys and which body of international law defines those protections. Each digital emblem is signed with a cryptographic certificate that can be constrained in both the geographic and temporal scope of its validity. The authenticity of digital emblems can be evaluated using simple, publicly-documented algorithms, which are free for anyone to use, and can be built in to software like web browsers, which run on commonplace mobile telephones or computers, or more specialized hardware like cameras or handheld wireless scanners. Standards-based validation of digital emblems can vastly simplify the work of customs and immigrations agents, and can also be easily incorporated in military equipment and processes, to ensure that protected entities are not targeted by military actions. While nighttime may render the "press" emblem painted on a press facility invisible to a drone or loitering munition, the RFID transponder or geographic bounds of a digital emblem can silently and efficiently ensure that it is not targeted.
Digital emblems can also protect diplomatic pouch shipments, diplomatic couriers, and diplomatic envoys, who are protected under the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which states that they may not be stopped, delayed, or inspected. This creates the paradox that the validity of their credentials must be evaluated, yet doing so has historically compromised the very rights that are intended to be signaled. Diplomatic markings have also been misappropriated as cover for the smuggling of drugs and other contraband. Digital emblems, which can be validated instantaneously, at a distance, and without interrupting the subject, solve both of these problems, while streamlining and automating customs and immigrations processes.
Trademarked goods are protected under a wide range of international laws, including the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, the Madrid Protocol, and TRIPS. Customs officers can use the same standards-based scanner to distinguish authentic from counterfeit goods and maintain supply-chain security, as they use to establish the authenticity of diplomatic pouches that display a digital emblem.
Likewise, shipments of endangered plants and animals are protected under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, and the 1979 Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, and the 1997 Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, both administered by the IAEA, protect the transfer and storage of nuclear fuel and waste. These applications too can be served using the same standards-based scanning mechanisms.
Digital emblems are managed by their respective assigning authorities, and can be created in as many specific instances as needed, without incurring any external costs. The authority to create and apply digital emblems can be delegated if necessary. Emblems can be managed in hierarchies. For instance, UNESCO might manage emblems assigned to portable artworks separately from emblems marking fixed facilities like museums and archives, or separately from emblems protecting diplomatic-pouch shipments. Likewise, emblems protecting people might be managed in very different ways, by different administrative bodies, than emblems protecting web sites or email servers.
Standardization Work
Digital emblems are currently being standardized within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the global standards body for communications protocols, ensuring that all parties have free and open access to the information and tools necessary to implement them. Weekly coordination meetings are held online to facilitate information exchange between DE implementors. Recent in-person meetings of DE implementors have been held at the IETF meetings in Vancouver, Canada, in July 2024, and Dublin, Ireland, in November, 2024. The next in-person meeting will be in Bangkok, Thailand, in March, 2025.